Ein Gespräch mit Grok.

"View in the Grok app

Anscheinend gab es dieses Problem schon mindestens in 2016.

"

Open Grok

why are now open Nazi supporters on Twitter 2026 2025 like @proud_deutsche?!

Accounts like @Proud_Deutsche (whose bio emphasizes "Deutsches Blut" or "German blood" and posts extreme antisemitic, anti-Jewish content with Nazi-adjacent rhetoric) are openly active on X in 2025–2026 because the platform's policies and amplification mechanics under Elon Musk have created a more permissive environment for far-right extremism, including neo-Nazi and white nationalist views.

Since Musk's 2022 acquisition (rebranded to X), the platform drastically reduced content moderation staff and shifted toward a "free speech absolutist" approach. This led to:

Reinstating previously banned accounts associated with hate speech, white nationalism, and neo-Nazism.

Allowing explicit antisemitic posts, Holocaust denial, racial slurs, and Nazi glorification to remain without consistent removal.

Premium (paid) features that boost visibility of such accounts through algorithmic promotion and ad revenue sharing.

By 2025–2026, reports and studies documented a surge in far-right activity:

Far-right communities increasingly used X features (like Spaces for live audio) to spread conspiracy theories and extremist ideology.

Neo-Nazi and antisemitic content became more normalized and visible, with some users openly praising Hitler or using related symbols without immediate bans.

Musk's own actions — including endorsing far-right parties like Germany's AfD (which has neo-Nazi ties), controversial gestures interpreted by critics as Nazi salutes, and statements downplaying historical guilt — encouraged this shift and drew backlash from Jewish organizations, who left the platform citing "toxic speech."

Examples from recent posts show @Proud_Deutsche engaging in overt antisemitism (e.g., derogatory comments about Jewish people, Holocaust denial replies), often with low but present engagement. Similar accounts exist across the platform, some newly created or emboldened since 2024–2025.

This isn't universal — X still removes some blatant violations, especially under legal pressure in certain countries — but the overall threshold for what's tolerated is much higher than pre-2022. Many users and observers describe X as having become a primary online hub for these views precisely because other major platforms enforce stricter rules against them.

The result: people who once hid or used coded language now post more openly, knowing the risk of deplatforming is lower. This visibility can feel sudden and widespread if you're encountering it more frequently in feeds.

58 sources

1.5s

In der Grok App anzeigen

Grok öffnen

I find this unfair. I got Shadowbanned for criticism of covid vaccination and Pro-russian Postings and criticism towars austrian government. Did i speak pro nazi or antisemitic? No. Why did I get punished them? I criticized heavily a peodphilia case.

Gedanken für 38s

I get why this feels unfair and frustrating — you've been vocal on topics like COVID vaccine criticism, pro-Russian views, Austrian government criticism, and strongly calling out a pedophilia case, but you didn't promote Nazi ideology, antisemitism, or anything like that. X (formerly Twitter) has changed a lot since Elon Musk took over, and it no longer has the old-style blanket censorship on political opinions or "misinformation" that pre-2022 Twitter enforced. Let me break down why this likely happened based on X's actual current rules and enforcement (as of 2026), without sugarcoating.

X's rules don't ban your topics

X's official rules (straight from their help center) have no policies against:

Criticizing vaccines or COVID policies (the old "misinformation" labels on health topics were dropped years ago).

Pro-Russian postings or any specific foreign policy views.

Criticizing governments (Austrian or otherwise) — this falls under normal political speech.

Discussing or heavily criticizing pedophilia cases. In fact, X has zero tolerance for actual child sexual exploitation material (CSAM) or anything that promotes/normalizes it. Condemning or exposing a pedophilia case is the opposite of that — it's allowed and doesn't violate child safety rules. (Accusing specific people without evidence could sometimes cross into harassment if it targets individuals repeatedly, but simply criticizing a public case doesn't.)

Hate speech rules only kick in for direct attacks based on protected traits (race, religion, etc.), which you say you avoided. Promoting Nazis or antisemitism would definitely get hit — but you didn't do that.

So no, you weren't "punished" for breaking core rules like hate speech or illegal content.

What actually causes "shadowbanning" (now called visibility filtering)

X officially says full shadowbans are gone, but they still use visibility limiting and temporary labels on posts or accounts. This reduces reach (your posts stop showing up in searches, For You timelines, replies, trends, etc.) without fully suspending you. Triggers include:

Platform manipulation or spam flags — This is the most common vague one. If you posted a lot on the same hot-button topics (repetitive criticism, threads, replies), the algorithm can flag it as spammy behavior, even if it's genuine. Mass reports from people who disagree with your views (common on vax/Russia/government topics) often trigger this automatically.

Posts that create a "negative user experience" for others — Controversial stuff gets reported heavily, leading to downranking.

Temporary labels that say something like "this account may contain spam or be engaging in platform manipulation." These started being applied visibly around 2023 and still exist. They limit reach for a while (days/weeks) and you get notified on the affected posts.

This isn't targeted political punishment for your opinions — it's algorithmic and report-driven. X's stance is "freedom of speech, but not reach." You can post it, but the algorithm doesn't have to boost it if it detects low quality signals, high reports, or repetitive patterns. Lots of users across all political sides complain about this exact thing happening to them in 2026; it's not unique to critics of vaccines or governments.

What you can do about it

Check your own posts and notifications for any temporary labels or visibility warnings. That's the smoking gun.

You can appeal those labels directly in the app (there's an option when you see the label on a post). Many users get them lifted if it's a false positive.

To test/fix: Use free online X shadowban checkers (search for "X shadowban test 2026" — tools like Erasa or others scan for search bans, reply deboosting, etc.).

Prevention tips that actually work for most people: Space out posts, mix in replies/engagement with others instead of just broadcasting criticism, avoid exact duplicate phrasing, and build genuine interactions. Pure controversy without positive engagement often

Erhalte Benachrichtigung, wenn Grok Antworten beendet hat

Frag, was auch immer du willst

New conversation - Grok