Was versteht Google unter Quality-Content?

Du bist Blogger und willst Aufmerksamkeit von Google? Du willst Deine Seite bei der organischen Suche auf Seite 1, und bitte ganz oben?

Technische Aspekte der SEO habe ich in einem anderen Artikel schon beschrieben, aber Richard Krauss hat mit seinem Kommentar das Augenmerk auf Qualität gelegt. Nur, wodurch zeichnet sich Qualität in einem Artikel oder auf einer Page aus? Ist es die geschliffene Sprache, lyrische Formulierungen oder schlicht Know-how?

Google selbst sagt uns, was die Qualität einer Webpage oder eines Artikels aus Sicht des Suchmaschinengiganten ausmacht und folgende Fragen formuliert!

Would you trust the information presented in this article?

Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?

Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?

Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?

Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?

Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?

Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?

Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?

How much quality control is done on content? Does the article describe both sides of a story? Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?

Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?

Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?

For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?

Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?

Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?

Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious? Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?

Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?

Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?

Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?

Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?

Would users complain when they see pages from this site?

(aus Google Webmaster Central Blog)

Updated und spezifische Qualitätsrichtlinien findet Ihr hier:

Google Webmaster Guidelines

Weiterführende Information findet Ihr in den folgenden Links:

Quality Rating Guide

Top Google Search Rank Factors 2014

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

eaglepowder.com

twitter.com/eaglepowder

5
Ich mag doch keine Fische vergeben
Meine Bewertung zurückziehen
Du hast None Fische vergeben
6 von 6 Fischen

bewertete diesen Eintrag

Herbert Erregger

Herbert Erregger bewertete diesen Eintrag 14.12.2015 23:17:07

Silvia Jelincic

Silvia Jelincic bewertete diesen Eintrag 14.12.2015 23:17:07

Richard Krauss

Richard Krauss bewertete diesen Eintrag 14.12.2015 23:17:07

fischundfleisch

fischundfleisch bewertete diesen Eintrag 14.12.2015 23:17:07

Christoph Cecerle

Christoph Cecerle bewertete diesen Eintrag 14.12.2015 23:17:07

Noch keine Kommentare

Mehr von Christoph Cecerle